Sunday, August 19, 2018

The Oliver Stone Conspiracy

The Oliver Stone Conspiracy
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

William Oliver Stone, better known as Oscar Winning Director Oliver Stone, is likely, in my opinion,  a hack and a fraud.  Beyond this, he is likely a criminal (keep reading).  I'm taking Melissa Gilbert's word for it.  She said he sexually harassed (assault is when you put someone in fear of a battery such as rape, so, assaulted may also apply)  her and his excuse was that everyone knew he was raunchy.  Look it up.  All public record.  Well, I don't know how "raunchy" Mr. Stone is, but, Gilbert had sex with a dog on FX's "Nip/Tuck", so, guessing pretty fucking raunchy.  Beyond this, his films are forgettable and nothing more than self-indulgent garbage intended to confuse the masses with RAND Corporation narratives disparaging the CIA. 

Taking into account his poor excuses for cinema, one must wonder if any of the scenes in "UTURN" were revelatory about his appetites.  For example, why was the incestuous rape scene between father and daughter in the film so lustful?  And, I also wonder if "Tropic Thunder" was a mock of Oliver Stone, Nick Nolte's character specifically.

That's just the Hollywood snooze news and gossip.  But, you should pay attention.  I mentioned RAND Corporation.  Now, what is the connection? 

Oliver Stone most likely invests in First Gulf Bank, HAB Bank, and United Central Bank.  The reason for this presumption is a 19 year old, very close to Oliver Stone, got a job as a credit analyst at First Gulf Bank in the early 2000s.  So, how a 19 year old got such a position without knowing an owner or key shareholder is puzzling to say the least.  Given a reasonable deduction, Oliver Stone is most likely so invested.  Checking his bank records may assist with any needed conclusions. 

Now, First Gulf Bank engages in internationally syndicated debt-based economics and modern slavery.[1]  This is called "globalization" by Alex Jones and his dedicated viewers.  First Gulf Bank is headquartered in Abu Dhabi.[2]  Also headquartered in Abu Dhabi is The Petroleum Club, which has locations worldwide.  It is an actual thing.  First Gulf Bank is connected to United Arab Emirates (UAE).[3]  And, the UAE are members of The Petroleum Club.[4]  Saudi Arabia and the UAE are different in that the UAE is controlled by the British and more involved in economics, trade, and "development", while Saudi Arabia is more for show, like the British "Royals".  So, the issue we have is with UAE and not so much Saudi Arabia when it comes to the bombing in Yemen.[5]  We need to talk to England about their continued imperialism, don't we?  Is the US a free country or do we need to re-fight the revolutionary war?  Alex Jones seems to think so.

"Today Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman began his visit to Los Angeles, where among other business leaders he and his entourage will not only meet major defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing but also executives at Disney and RAND Corporation in Santa Monica."[6]

Now, does the Prince meet on behalf of the UAE or Saudi Arabia?  Does it matter?  Am I getting off track?  See, the connections are there.  So, what about money-laundering?

Well, let me give you some examples and hopefully you will share this article with law enforcement and national security agencies so they can help stop the soft coup being organized by the UAE and RAND Corporation against the United States.  Okay?  Here it goes...

Oliver Stone is a Wall Street Banker from a Wall Street family.  First Gulf Bank is more than likely a big part of his portfolio.  Reasons already provided to FBI.  But, they may need to hear from more of us before taking any action.  I've established the connection between all of them satisfactorily I hope and believe. 

So, RAND Corporation is run by Karen Elliott House who also runs and owns The Wall Street Journal.  Are you with me?  Okay.  RAND Corporation is supposedly a non-profit charity.[7]  Now, what is a "charity" doing meeting with defense contractors and the Saudi Prince?  Does it bother anyone that they are also running the Wall Street Journal?  Am I the only one seeing the connection here? 

RAND Corporation was founded in 1950 and was likely wholly responsible for the blacklisting of multiple Hollywood stars and elite during the "red scare" they orchestrated when they began to influence Hollywood.  In addition, they are arguably responsible for the death of James Dean and Marilyn Monroe (see earlier blog entries and  Beyond this, they turned great cinema into garbage by re-making and re-writing such films as "Love Affair" and "Imitation of Life".  The re-makes were racist and not aligned with the spirit of the original films.  Look into it at your leisure.  (Side Note: RAND Corporation has infiltrated Disney, ABC, and GAIA, among others.  See facebook link above for more citations and info.  It is all there.)

That's more Hollywood stories...  But, you may be more interested in the political side of this story.  See, RAND Corporation has donated a traceable amount of $500,000 mostly to the Democrats.[8]  RAND Corporation lobbies on behalf of defense contractors and oil companies, among others.[9]  They are a charity, so, that's cool, right?  The Clinton Foundation and RAND Corporation are very close and work together.[10]  Hillary Clinton donated $250 to Donald Trump for his presidential campaign through the Clinton Foundation in 2016.[11]

So, it is my theory that there is a soft coup by a bunch of rich assholes who can't handle that the United States of America is a free country and they've been using all means at their disposal to destroy western civilization through the guise of business and charity.  I think we can do better.  And, I think the above proves money-laundering and RICO violations.  Or, at least provides a basis for a serious investigation, don't you?

I'm tired of propaganda and I unbelievably am switching to Republican if there are no Libertarian or Green Party candidates to choose on the ballot.  Does everyone agree we should have ranked choice voting and a more open democracy or am I crazy?

[Side Note:  Sean C. A. Stone was given over 24 hours to edit or suggest changes to this story.  He was offered the by-line and a complete editorial control over the content if changes were submitted before the 11pm deadline.  He has been given the option to request editing or changes after publication.  He is innocent and not to be maligned or unfairly associated with Wall Street criminals regardless of family ties.]


Sunday, July 22, 2018

Do You Have An Exploitative, Neglectful, and/or Abusive Parent or Guardian?

Do You Have An Exploitative, Neglectful, and/or Abusive Parent or Guardian?
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

I have been a child advocate ever since I can remember.  Many of my school days were spent defending the innocent from unjust bullying.  I have an AA degree in English Literature, a BA degree with a double major of History and Philosophy, and I attended law school for some time.  I've studied art, activism, drama, music, and much more.  I passed the Washington state Educator Skills Test (WEST-B) and spent a brief time teaching in public schools.  I've been organizing and campaigning primarily for teen liberty.  And, I've met thousands of people who have been unjustly institutionalized by exploitative, neglectful, and abusive parents and guardians.  How do you identify such a parent or guardian?

First, we shall examine exploitation of children by parents and/or guardians.  One might argue exploitation comes with neglect and abuse.  Merriam-Webster defines "exploitation" as "an act or instance of exploiting".[1]  When you click on "exploiting" the site takes you to the definition for "exploit" which is defined as a "deed, act; especially: notable or heroic act."  Then, Merriam-Webster provides an example of "exploit" that states, "Once famed as an actor, John Wilkes Booth is now remembered for a single exploit, his assassination of Lincoln."[2]  Now, defines "exploitation" as "use or utilization, especially for profit", "selfish utilization", and "the combined, often varied, use of public-relations and advertising techniques to promote a person, movie, product, etc."[3]  Exploitation can come in the form of wannabe starlets in West Hollywood, who wishing they had a bigger piggybank, decide to cling on (or is it Klingon) to and exploit legitimate talent like Verne Troyer and Sean Stone.  However, we are focusing on how parents and guardians exploit their children and wards, so, let's continue...

It appears to me that "exploitation" may be too vague a word with too many varying interpretations to be useful in effectively communicating the issues with modern slavery and human trafficking.  Is exploitation murder?  In some instances, according to the example provided by, the answer is yes.  I don't care to draw a Venn diagram[4] to explain how you can hold varying positions and contain multiple qualities between various sources at this time.  If you do not understand basic logic and reason, please discontinue reading this article.  Now, defines "slavery" as "drudgery, toil", "submission to a dominating influence", "the state of a person who is a chattel of another", and/or "the practice of slaveholding".[5] 

It is my hope we can all agree that slavery is a form of selfish utilization of others for profit. defines "profit" as "a valuable return, gain", the excess of returns over expenditure in a transaction or series of transactions; especially : the excess of the selling price of goods over their cost", "net income usually for a given period of time", "the ratio of profit for a given year to the amount of capital invested or to the value of sales," and/or "the compensation accruing to entrepreneurs for the assumption of risk in business enterprise as distinguished from wages or rent."  So, when examining modern slavery it would be fair to say that the current US economic system itself is the "dominating influence" to which all US citizens have been unfairly subjugated to modern slavery through a debt-based economy in which private bankers at the Federal Reserve manufacture means of trade which they then distribute based on who is the best slave to the system.

Given the state of affairs, many parents feel they are doing their children a service by exploiting them, enslaving them, locking them in private prisons, and preparing them for life in the so-called "real world" by treating them like garbage while trying to make a living selling their children and/or their child's talent.  One example of a victim of this form of exploitation is Gary Coleman.  There are many more.

Personally and professionally, I do not believe in slavery of any kind and I am an abolitionist.  Therefore, I do not indoctrinate my loved ones into the "slavery-lifestyle" and try to save those around me who have been clearly treated like chattel as if they exist solely for the amusement of those higher on the "food chain".  Some may disagree with my position.  And, I think they are evil and stupid to do so.

When you train your child like a horse or a dog through a rewards and consequence system of basic needs and trauma, you are using what modern scientists call "behaviorism" and "behavior modification".  Behavior modification is a euphemism for brainwashing and mind control.  (See Congressional Record Here:  So, whether or not you yourself were programmed, doing it to your children is tantamount to the worst form of child abuse.  In addition, you are training your child to be a slave when his/her only reward for a day of "drudgery and toil" is a "gold star" on a poster board or a 5-minute phone call with a disinterested father.  Using violence, deprivation of basic needs, and other inherently disrespectful methods for "training" result in acting out because people don't like being disrespected, abused, and enslaved regardless of their age group.  So, if you treated others (including your children) as you would wish to be treated (assuming you wish to be treated with respect, free from abuse and exploitation), then you might not have to deal with a "struggling teen".

Unfortunately, social services in the United States takes children from loving homes and places them in institutions that farm them out as maid service at hotels, farmhands, construction crews, and more while the institutions (a.k.a. modern slaveholders) take any earnings to cover "program expenses" not covered by the state.  Some parents are stupid and/or evil enough to pay to have their children abducted and taken to a modern slave camp where they are treated as poorly as those coming from more unfortunate backgrounds.  However, the wealthier kids are trained to become overseers of the less fortunate so they can adopt the "Samuel L. Jackson" position from "Django Unchained" instead of being at the bottom of the "food pyramid".  But, they always claim it is "for the child's own good".  And, I think that is complete bullshit.

I personally and professional refuse to participate in such a system to any degree beyond basic necessity.  You may be afraid to join me in fighting to stop modern slavery.  If so, I understand.  However, I agree with Emiliano Zapata who said, "I'd prefer to die standing, than to live always on my knees."  I will not kneel before anyone.  God understands I was tortured and getting on my knees is too painful.  He doesn't want me to suffer.  So, I pray "indian style".  The point of knowing suffering is to learn compassion, if you are compassionate and empathetic, you no longer need suffering. 

I've taught children of all age groups, including pre-school.  All my pre-schoolers were adorable, sweet, curious, and creative.  I found something to love and cherish about each of their budding personalities.  So, I don't think the kids are born assholes.  Maybe a couple have some weird karmic issues, but, overall they start out good and well-meaning.  So, I believe it is the environment not the individual that is primarily responsible for modern "mental illness" and "behavioral health diagnoses".  And, that psychiatric or behavioral labels are simply another tool used by "dominating influence" to force the people into "submission".  If the United States of America is to be a free country, we must turn the Federal Reserve into a public utility and immediately outlaw all forms of behavior modification and slavery regardless of what euphemisms may be used to describe the current state of affairs. 

If your parent or guardian has exploited your labor, abused you, or neglected you, please consider filing a complaint with the Attorney General of your home-state.  You can find reporting resources at  You may also wish to contact an attorney to see under what laws (contract and tort) you can sue for full compensation for your work and any injuries sustained.  David Taylor v. Provo Canyon School is one case in which you will find a youth sued both his mother and the program for tortious misconduct.  The courts found the parent was 75% liable for all damages because they "knew or should have known" that Provo Canyon School is an abusive facility and it was the parent/guardian's responsibility to protect the child from that abuse.  In failing to do so, the parent was liable for the damages.[6]  Similar court cases can be found against government agencies who have entrusted youth to the care of private, for-profit segregated congregate care facilities (i.e. ranches, farms, The Hershey School, group homes, boarding schools, detention centers, treatment centers, etc.).  Exercise your rights, file complaints, and demand justice!

Monday, July 16, 2018

The Court of Public Opinion and the Public Square

The Court of Public Opinion and the Public Square
by Angela Smith, National Coordinator/Co-Founder of HEAL

In order to celebrate the 4th of July, HEAL chose to throw an approximately 10-day "comedy roast" on our Twitter and Youtube accounts.  Our Twitter accounts are at  and  And, our Youtube account is at  For this satirical and artistic social media project, we chose to target corruption in politics and the media.  Most everyone took our "roasting" in stride.  However, the @heal247 account was restricted on the 4th of July, amounting to the violation of our first amendment rights.  The @Got2LoveTheFuzz account was restricted on July 6th, 2018.  Since that time, both accounts have remained virtually falsely imprisoned.  And, this is without due process of law, which makes it more than one constitutional liberty infringement.

The legal arguments for the restoration of the HEAL Twitter accounts are many.  First, let us establish that there is a social construct known as the Court of Public Opinion.[1]  There is debate about whether the public should be permitted to share opinions since it may lead to "mob justice" and "revenge".[2]  However, this is the United States of America and it is my understanding that the first amendment protects the rights of all citizens to free speech and expression as well as the right to air grievances in the public square.  So, the Court of Public Opinion is what some may see as a "necessary evil" in a free and democratic society.

The second point I'll make here is regarding social media such as Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, and similar sites amounting to virtual public squares.  A recent article in the Washington Examiner states that Twitter's censorship of accounts may be unconstitutional.[1]  And, that is our primary contention regarding the censorship of our accounts at this time.  However, we did find evidence suggesting that Twitter solely censored as a result of an individual complaint regarding the content of some of our tweets during the "comedy roast".  So, the issue may be more with Twitter's policies regarding handling complaints rather than with any algorithm or blind censorship.  Twitter should accept that, given its partnership with the Library of Congress to store and track all tweets for the public record, it makes it by design a virtual public square.[2]  Twitter's hypocrisy in suing the US Government for violating its first amendment rights[3] while violating those of its users is beyond measure.

It seems to me that if you are of particularly thin skin, you should avoid public interaction.  There are many unpleasant people who say and do unpleasant things as a matter of right because of the nature of freedom.  However, infringing on anyone's right to free speech, no matter how unpopular their belief or expression may be, is itself unconstitutional and a violation of the laws of the United States of America.  Therefore, I would heartily suggest Twitter revise its policies to disallow reporting of tweets for any offense or statement made and simply allow individuals to block (avoid viewing/alerts) from accounts they do not like.  If that does not satisfy the individuals who are offended, advise them they can always choose to leave the platform if they find free speech and expression too difficult to accept.

We can provide the evidence for the basis of every tweet made on our account, including any referencing the Petroleum Club.  And, I have contacted the media through various channels and we have filed a legal complaint regarding this violation.  It is our understanding the offending parties have three weeks to respond.  Stay tuned to see if our accounts are restored and free speech and expression are protected for all Americans.

[The footnotes did not transfer properly to this format.  Sorry for any confusion.]



Monday, July 9, 2018

Why Hillary Clinton IS NOT a Real Life "Wonder Woman"

Why Hillary Clinton IS NOT a Real Life "Wonder Woman"
by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

Like Tabetha Wallace, Hillary Clinton has seriously gone to great lengths to shame victims of sexual assault, exploitation, racism, and modern slavery.  In addition, Hillary Clinton is a liar and protects and associates with known (alleged) pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein and John Podesta.  Now, Diana Prince (a.k.a. Wonder Woman) opposes sexual assault, exploitation, racism, lies/deception, and modern slavery.  In addition, she protects people from exploitation and opposes the NAZIs.  Clinton's top donors included George Soros, who admits to being a Nazi collaborator. 

If Hillary Clinton is being vague in her comparison of herself to "Wonder Woman" and solely associates with the Amazonian myth of the character, then there may be a grain of honesty in her claims.  But, Wonder Woman left the Amazonian-lifestyle to help men and mankind against brutal tyranny and enslavement of dissenters.  So, again, Hillary Clinton has missed the mark and like Tabetha Wallace proven she is too stupid to understand the subtext of even a children's comic book series.  How could anyone expect her to be qualified to run a country if she can't even understand comic books?

That being said, the Amazonian myth reports: "According to Diodorus, the Amazons under the rule of Queen Myrina, invaded the lands of the Atlantians. Amazons defeated the army of the Atlantian city of Cerne, treated the captives savagely, killed all the men, led into slavery the children and women, and razed the city."[1] In addition, it is reported that the Amazonian myth may have been a fictionalized account of the Scythians.  This is interesting since in "Star Wars" the bad guys with the evil empire are known as "Sith Lords", which may be a hint as to what is at stake in the 2020 election if Hillary Clinton runs and the Democratic National Committee is so stupid or corrupt that they choose to nominate her again.  And, most everyone has seen the George Soros as the Sith Lord meme on Twitter.

I would prefer to defeat the NAZIs and see Hillary Clinton and anyone who still supports her dead, insane, or in jail.  By insane, I mean institutionalized in an asylum because in Greek mythology, a Maenad is a "mad and demented woman" and it seems fitting to lock up such people.  Typically, I would not support institutionalizing anyone.  But, in this case, consider me "Kafkaesque".  I agree with Abraham Lincoln who said, ""Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves, and, under a just God, cannot long retain it."[2]  Since Hillary Clinton and her friends (i.e. Tipper Gore) have been promoting the unlawful imprisonment and exploitation of minors in private prisons/labor camps masquerading as treatment centers and boarding schools for over 30 years and expanded the war on drugs and current US prison population, she clearly is someone who prefers war to peace and slavery/prison to constitutional freedoms.  In hopes to give her what she wants, let us wage a war of words and give her a life in prison without parole where she can experience slavery firsthand.  That's the best she deserves.

[2] Abraham Lincoln, letter to H.L. Pierce, April 6, 1859. From the series Great Ideas of Western Man.

Friday, July 6, 2018


By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

We first noticed an issue when our website was hacked and some of the links were changed from legitimate websites to pornographic websites.  Then, we noticed misspellings and changes to names of facilities on the watch-list at that were done through unauthorized access.  This happened in the early 2000s. 

Recently, we've noticed some of our videos on have been edited without our knowledge or consent.  The editing has been done in a way that does not match the script or the original videos that remain saved offline.  Most of the content appears to be the same, but, we have not had a chance to compare every original to every video and some of the originals no longer exist. 

Some of our volunteers have reported not receiving e-mails, not getting their alerts, and similar issues.  Others have reported receiving "spoofed" messages in which the sender appears to be a friend or ally, but, the message is actually fake.  You can check this usually by seeing if the return e-mail address is the same as the one shown in your inbox.  I've personally deleted e-mails that are questionable that appear to be "spoofed" because they often contain one or more viruses.

Beyond this, on July 4th, 2018, we celebrated by having a #FirstAmendmentRevolution on our Twitter account at  Twitter arbitrarily put a "temporary restriction" status on our account so we cannot Tweet or access most of the functions of that account at this time.  As a result, we are currently tweeting from a secondary HEAL account at  Please follow us on that account for current information and updates.  Both accounts have been experiencing strange phenomenon with people being added to and removed from our following and follower lists.  We have not unfollowed anyone from either account.  We have not blocked any followers on either account.  If you follow us or want to show your support, please go to the above linked account and follow us.

On top of all of this, we've been receiving harassing e-mails and calls.  There have been more death threats to us and people we love (both publicly and privately).  And, the corporate bullshit has grown exponentially with requests to advertise on our site.  Of course, we always decline.

We have filed a complaint with the Washington State Attorney General and hope that our civil liberties will be fully protected and restored as soon as possible.  In the meantime, expect us to become more controversial than you could ever imagine and stay tuned to the #FirstAmendmentRevolution!

Monday, July 2, 2018

Ways of Interpreting Batman

Ways of Interpreting Batman
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

Batman's back story is that he is filthy rich and pissed off because some street "thug" (Joe Chill) robbed and killed his parents, stealing his mother's pearls or breaking the necklace (a symbol of false wisdom), who becomes a "superhero" to avenge the death of his parents.  He fails to realize that his parents contributed to the problem of wealth inequality which led to the desperation of characters like The Joker who are simply trying to survive in the modern jungle.  In continuing in their exploitative business practices, he himself could be considered a "Two-Face" and Batman and Two-Face may be allegorical or represent the reality of both men as balancing good and evil within. 

However, Two-Face started out as a hero and becomes a villain when he realizes the system is too corrupt to be fixed from within.  He chooses to give up and turn to a life of crime since he sees no heroes in the vicinity.  In addition, Batman is a player who seduces women which makes him kind of a whore of sorts.  This is one interpretation and may explain why Two-Face turns to crime in order to mock the supposed "superhero" in the "black mask". 

Beyond this, other "villains" in the Batman series are all victims of exploitation, crime, intellectual property theft (i.e. The Riddler), and various forms of oppression.  Since Batman is trying to make sure they stay in their place and avoid challenging his authority or that of the den of thieves known as the "upper class" in modern society, he himself may be considered a villain and people misread the comic book.

Of course, we also have the Suicide Squad which is obviously a group of people who have been used in human experiments and therefore have a valid reason to challenge the status quo and give a big "fuck you" to those responsible.  Since Wayne Enterprises works on defense contracts, among other things, it is clear that Batman is most likely a symbol of the RAND Corporation.  A symbol that on the outside may seem benign or helpful, but, beneath the facade is actually responsible for the world's suffering.

Now, it gets even worse...  Batman, a supposed womanizing bachelor, adopts a male gymnast named Robin that he continually puts in dangerous situations where his life is threatened.  They have an underground lair (like a dungeon or basement) where they play "dress up" and you can read into that what you like.  But, as far as I understand it, when a single man adopts a gymnast and plays with the kid in a dark cave or basement, it isn't a good thing for anyone involved. 

For these reasons, I tend to root for the "villains" in the Batman series.  And, I have always preferred Superman/Clark Kent.  Superman always does the right thing, helps people for the sake of doing good in the world, and is loyal to the woman he loves.  He is also an honest journalist and protector of all that is good.  So, in a battle between Batman and Superman, I'm for Superman all the way.  And, Superman actually has super powers, unlike Batman who just uses his defense contracts to use the money to build and experiment with weaponized toys for his own personal gain and pleasure. 

That said, I loved "The Dark Knight" and Christian Bale did a great job.  I have no issue with any actor who has taken on the role and believe that good people see the good and sometimes buy propaganda without questioning more.  It is great to like cool gadgets and want a hero to make the streets safer.  But, the streets should be safe for everyone, not just those who can afford a night on the town and are too stupid to dress down when visiting the city at night.  I also think Alfred should have been given an early paid retirement as soon as Bruce was old enough to take care of himself instead of being held captive for companionship for a boy who never grew up and couldn't understand that his parents had it coming.
[Note: I love what Kevin Smith did to improve the storyline with Bluntman and Chronic.  Now, that's a dynamic duo I can get behind.]

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Tabetha Wallace Is A No Talent Hack

Tabetha Wallace Is A No Talent Hack
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

Tabetha Wallace has worked on many forgettable projects including "Night of the Alien" (2011), "The Rage" (2017), and participated in introducing abusive and degrading behavior modification rituals to what was initially an enjoyable contest for aspiring chefs (Hell's Kitchen on Fox). 

Beyond that, her IMDb page only shows her listed as an "actress", "miscellaneous crew", and "producer".  She has no talent as an "actress" and doesn't understand the basics of fine art.  So, she is a liar on top of having no talent at all.  "Miscellaneous Crew" usually indicates someone has been hired to "handle" her co-stars and use whatever means necessary to control them and censor their free expression.  Beyond this, a producer credit usually suggests someone comes from money unless they actually worked on the project.  Wallace does no research and simply says the dumbest things on camera which proves she has money and was not raised poor.  When your family owns a farm, they are not poor.  So, her "poor me"/"humble beginnings" line is truly too much to listen to when she constantly shows everyone what a spoiled white girl she is and what she thinks of minorities off and on set.

One African American co-worker called her out on her racism.  Tabetha gave her a necklace or "trinket" to "make nice" and shut her up.  Epic fail.  She dresses like a prostitute on set and continually makes inappropriate comments to male co-workers.  She has done this on air multiple times and is completely inappropriate when Lee Camp is a guest.  I understand why he discontinued being on the Friday show.  I know she has offered to give "lip service" to multiple co-workers in hopes to use the encounter to fake a #metoo to control them.  It is part of her training for how to manipulate and control others.

My heart goes out to anyone who has experienced this type of manipulation.  It is truly despicable the way some beautiful artists are treated by no talent hacks who think they can use their heritage as a weapon against real families.  I'm so disgusted by all of this that I am taking a break from watching RT until Tabetha is off the air.  Anyone else at RT who has been participating in her abuse or assisting her in her efforts to exploit others should also be shown the door.  RT is better than that. 

Tabetha is not pretty enough to be eye-candy and not smart enough to contribute to the conversation.  So, why on earth she remains on air is beyond me.  I truly hope RT will make the right decision and get rid of this racist, bigoted, horrible excuse for an on air personality.  She certainly has no business worthy of consideration.

Finally, on Twitter @TabethaWatching back in March or around then, she admitted publicly that she is "the devil".  So, when one white bitch continually says she's "white" and writes on twitter that she is "the devil", maybe take her word for it on that one.  Don't carry water for her like some of her "guests".  It is beneath you.

Monday, June 25, 2018

How To Spot A Maenad

How To Spot A Maenad
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

A Maenad is a mad or demented woman according to Greek lore and legend.  They have no magic powers and try to use and enslave children, real women, and men as their personal piggybanks.  They promote racism and strange notions of what it is appropriate to do with family members. 

It is hard to say whether or not psychotic men are simply responding to years of abuse from a Maenad or group of Maenads in their vicinity.  Sometimes, when you've been tortured for decades, you become so angry that you snap and take your frustrations out on the innocent.  This is an unfortunate consequence of Maenad abuse.

Maenads, in my estimation, were a horrible mistake involving a mishap with flies.  This is why they enjoy Coca-Cola because there is a problem at the factory.  Coca-Cola does not keep the area above the cylinders clean and there is often fly residue falling into their products.  This is one reason Maenads love to drink Coca-Cola.  As someone with a keen palate, I can always taste the nasty when served Coca-Cola.  This is why I choose alternative beverages.

As with non-human insects, smoke helps confuse and deter them from becoming too big a bother.  They really hate tobacco smoke.  But, all smoke bothers them.  There is a study from St. Andrews University[1] showing that birds line their nests with cigarette butts to keep their homes pest-free.  This is a lesson human beings should take to heart when working to protect their homes from pests, including Maenads.

In short, if you have a Maenad in your life, you should expel them immediately by any means necessary.  If they've been raping children, defrauding family members, borrowing money with no intention to pay it back, running up credit card debt, playing mind games to confuse you with lies and misinformation, killing pets in front of you, or any similar behavior, please contact the authorities or at least tell them to "go to hell" and get away from them pronto.

Anyone who continues to abuse, rape, and murder children believing that someday they may become the next Hillary Clinton, really deserves the death penalty, in my opinion.  It is my hope that you agree.

In addition, if you enter a house that uses McCormick seasoning, they have no taste.  There may be a Maenad in the vicinity.  If you see a nursery rhyme book with a witch or maenad on the cover, it is intended as a spell book (these people are really stupid) and meant to instill fear and introduce mind control at an early age.  If you look through the pages of such books, you will find allegories for raping, brainwashing, and murdering people.  In looking through a copy of one recently, I found in the middle a black baby hanging from a tree.  This disgusted me beyond measure.  If you find cookbooks in the house of someone who doesn't cook and/or doesn't cook well, especially if it is about crockery cooking, then they are a Maenad.  And, if they really believe any power comes from what they do to good people in weird rituals based on poorly written nursery rhymes, they are stupid beyond compare.  The humane thing would be to just terminate them.  But, to avoid any jail-time yourself, you may want to turn them in for their crimes instead of taking the law into your own hands.  Smoke them if you got 'em.


Friday, June 1, 2018


by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

I wasn't going to write about this today.  I cooled down last night and when I woke up, decided I didn't need to write about this topic.  I was angry, and am still quite annoyed, with the hysteria around Roseanne's tweets and Drake's "blackface" protest picture from 2007.  Then, I watched the #HarryandKelly FocusTV interview with Sean Stone at and became irritated again with Kelly's need to "#metoo" Sean for no legitimate reason.

I had planned to throw a bunch of important quotes from artists down in this rant as a sort of gauntlet.  But, I think I'll stick to my own thoughts and leave it at that. 

Art should make you think and feel.  It should inspire and enlighten.  It should shed light on the truth and help you see things from a different perspective.  Free expression and speech, should not be shamed into conforming to any expectation and certainly should never be silenced.

First, I didn't see Roseanne Barr's tweet about Valerie Jarrett.  I only heard about it.  But, I know Roseanne's work and know for a fact that she is not a racist, homophobe, nor bigot.  So, I think she may have made a comparison between a character from "Planet of the Apes", an evolved chimpanzee played by a white woman (I'm pretty sure is British) and Valerie Jarrett, a politically public figure.  I think Roseanne is so not racist that she didn't even consider the optics of the tweet or that it might offend some people who don't know her and/or don't wish to bother to try to understand what she meant before freaking out like a CRYBABY and shaming her into silencing herself. 

I find it more disgusting that people would react and publicly shame a beloved comedian out of their own ignorance than take a moment to understand or try to understand what was being said with the message and by the messenger.  George W. Bush was compared to a chimpanzee all over the place.  Bill Maher has repeatedly called Donald Trump an orangutan.  I think we need to move beyond historical interpretations of commentary and at least try to understand what someone is saying before labeling them a bigot, sexist, racist, or demanding they be permanently shamed into silence.  I find it far more frightening that people would actively demand the silence of others who are honestly communicating, even if crudely at times, than any work of art, public statement, or moment of open and free self expression.

In addition, Drake's "blackface" stunt was a protest against how he felt he was being treated as a black entertainer by the industry.  I don't understand how people can flip out and go off because they don't like Drake's artistic expression and protest.  Maybe it was meant to make you uncomfortable.  Maybe it was meant as a commentary of how the industry treats people, particularly minorities.  I love the uncensored video of "Puttin on the Ritz" by Taco.  See:  Now, if you watch that video, you will see it is a commentary on class disparities, homelessness, and the grand illusion of wealth and high society juxtaposed to how minorities and poor people are treated by that same crowd.  But, you will see a couple of people dancing in "blackface".  And, it is a social commentary and art.  Maybe you can't handle art and should just shut the fuck up if you happen upon an artist you don't understand.  If you can't control your reactions and inquire and try to understand before attacking the artist or speaker, then you are the fucking problem.  Seriously!

Now, Sean Stone said nothing inappropriate and I think Lauren should have acknowledged that and defended Sean rather than thanking Kelly for defending her when nothing offensive was said or done.  And, Lauren should dress more conservatively if she wants to avoid sexually explicit comments.  You can't dress like you "give it away" and then act offended when someone thinks you are a bit loose.  Regardless, Sean didn't even say anything offensive.  I watched the entire interview twice.  His comments were taken out of context and he was dressed appropriately while others were not.

If someone says something that shocks or surprises you, take a moment to consider what they've said from the best possible perspective.  That's called listening with love.  If you are not coming from a place of love, keep your mouth shut.  With love, if there is confusion or misunderstanding, you can respectfully ask for clarification or an explanation.  This may satisfy you and help you appreciate the free speech and expression of others.  If not, you are in the fucking USA and people fucking have the right to fucking say what's on their mind.  All you do with your fucking shaming is destroy the first amendment and drive everyone crazy with your bullshit social controls rather than actually work to solve real problems like modern slavery, exploitation, homelessness, and hunger.  Save your outrage for real issues.  If you want respect, respect others enough to hear them out before shaming anyone.  Otherwise, fuck you.


Friday, May 18, 2018

Alternative Theory on JFK Assassination

Alternative Theory on JFK Assassination
by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

John F. Kennedy had an affair with Marilyn Monroe.[1]  Marilyn Monroe was a genius who appreciated intelligence, but, was treated like a whore by the industry.  On a list she made on a lark regarding which celebrities she found sexiest, she included Albert Einstein.[2]

Monroe had talent for drama and comedy.  She was diverse and poetic in her actions and movements.  Her love life was filled with turmoil likely because everyone was attracted to her, but, didn't really want to know her.  She looked for love and found only lust sometimes disguised by flattery.

Kennedy, having taken advantage of her to an extent, was afraid that the truth would come out and there would be a scandal.  It is likely that the RAND Corporation or some similar outfit had her killed to silence her and avoid any scandal involving infidelity in the "Camelot" administration.

The Central Intelligence Agency, horrified by the loss of America's sweetheart, decided it was unacceptable to assassinate such a beautiful artist to keep up appearances and avoid a scandal of one's own making as a result of moral turpitude.  So, they arranged to have Kennedy killed so he could ironically maintain his illusion of grandeur while avoiding his sex scandal becoming the basis of his memorial in time. 

Now, this is just a theory.  But, I think it is as plausible as any other.  And, perhaps the CIA was trying to help and achieve justice for the loss of an American icon.  Or, you could just conclude this belongs in the annals of Mad Magazine.


Wednesday, January 10, 2018

HEAL No Longer Supports Ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

HEAL No Longer Supports Ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder (revised: January 14th, 2018)

The HEAL Team read the preamble and many articles making wonderful claims about the impact the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child would have for American children and children around the globe.  We believed it to be a step in the right direction for protecting children from harm and providing a framework by which children would be afforded rights and protections not currently provided.  We believed that the phrases in the Convention text, "Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding...Considering that the child should be fully prepared to live an individual life in society, and brought up in the spirit of the ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance, freedom, equality and solidarity..."[1] meant that children would be afforded and mandated the right of children to grow up in a family environment.  However, the remainder of the UN Convention establishes a near mandate for institutionalizing children, something HEAL opposes vehemently.

HEAL opposes any international, federal, or local law that provides for the establishment and funding of institutional "care" for children.  Even the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) states that institutionalization is never better for a child than being in a family environment.[2]  But, language throughout the Convention states, "States Parties shall render appropriate assistance to parents and legal guardians in the performance of their child-rearing responsibilities and shall ensure the development of institutions, facilities and services for the care of children.... States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that children of working parents have the right to benefit from child-care services and facilities for which they are eligible... No part of the present article or article 28 shall be construed so as to interfere with the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish and direct educational institutions... States Parties shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law..."[3]  And, for this reason HEAL cannot endorse and does not wish to see the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ratified by the US at this time.  It needs significant amendment before we would consider supporting it in the future.

People reading this may not understand the full context we are working from at HEAL.  Take for example the fact that in Massachusetts, the Department of Early Education and Care (EEC), which the public and likely you understand to provide Head Start, Pre-School, and other supports for pre-K children, is responsible for licensing (and sometimes funding placements) programs like Chamberlain International School.  Chamberlain is one of many facilities on the HEAL watch-list for exploitation and abuse and you can learn more about it at  So, when we read that the UN wants more funding and power granted to EEC which you may erroneously believe is solely about educational opportunities for pre-K children, we recognize that, at least in the US, this would mean providing institutional "care" like that found at Chamberlain for even more children.  And, this is something we cannot and will never endorse.  In addition, the US already fails to regulate and establish standards for K-12 private schools (including boarding schools) and that the vast majority of States do not regulate these facilities at all, either due to conflicts of interest or simple State policy.  In addition, many of these private residential "schools" (including those identified as "ranches" or providing "work therapy") force their captives to perform labor under threat of deprivation or abuse.  There is no mention regarding coerced labor either in the convention.  And, as stated, exploitation does not appear to be used interchangeably with "forced labor" in similar UN Conventions and therefore should not be assumed to imply inclusion in the definition of exploitation in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. 

There is not one mention in the Convention on prohibiting child labor or providing children the right to not be forced into labor.  The Convention does state that children must be protected from exploitation, including sexual and economic/labor-based exploitation.[4]  However, there is no prohibition of "forced labor" and no mention of preventing "slavery".  You can assume whatever you wish, but, without specifying a prohibition, it seems seriously lacking and provides more loopholes for exploitation and modern slavery.  This is a major issue any international convention on children's rights should prioritize.  There is not one mention that children have the right to be raised in their communities and away from segregated congregate care.  In fact, segregation is not even referenced in the Convention.  Segregation is a major issue that adversely affects children in the US and around the globe.  The Convention does not address this major issue. 

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is very explicit in Article 27 protecting individuals with disabilities specifically from slavery, servitude, and forced/compulsory labor.  Source: (p. 21).  That same Convention (Article 19, page 15) also specifically states that disabled persons have the right to integration in their society and to be free from segregation.   And, those sections are separate from the statements in that convention regarding exploitation, violence, and abuse.  So, one must conclude that for the purposes of such Conventions, the definition and prohibition of slavery/forced labor as well as the right to be free from segregation is separate from the protection from exploitation.  The fact that prohibiting forced labor/slavery in the Convention of the Rights of the Child is omitted raises serious concerns for HEAL. 

HEAL sees the two greatest threats to children and youth in the US as segregation and forced labor/modern slavery.  These are likely the two issues globally most in need of redress.  And, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child fails miserably to establish firm rules to protect children and youth from both.

HEAL has updated our legislative request (see:  to remove the portion requesting that the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child be ratified by the US Senate.  Given that it appears to harm children more than help them and fails to address significant issues and abuses affecting children and youth globally, we cannot support it.

Our legislative request is subject to revision and while our volunteers do our best to investigate all matters before taking a position, we did fail to thoroughly examine the Convention before endorsing it.  We ask that if you find error or fault with any statement or position we take and you believe any statement or endorsement has been made ignorantly or in contradiction to our stated mission to stop institutionalized abuse of children and youth (which for us includes stopping the institutionalization of children and youth), please contact us at to let us know.  We will make immediate all necessary corrections.
HEAL no longer endorses the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and we suggest others reconsider their support of the Convention given its failures to address child labor, wrongful institutionalization, forced/compulsory labor, and other issues while practically mandating a system in which all of these violations are likely to continue unabated.