Thursday, August 30, 2018

The Legal and Philosophical Argument for Abolishing Segregated Congregate Care in the United States of America

The Legal and Philosophical Argument for Abolishing Segregated Congregate Care in the United States of America

by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

I am a woman of faith.  In regards to philosophy of mind, or what some refer to as mental health and wellness, I prefer Abraham Maslow, an American Psychologist to any who may have been influenced by fascists in Europe before founding RAND Corporation in 1950 at 1776 Main St in Santa Monica, CA.  Since RAND Corporation is the front for the British Empire, the street address alone is a big insult.  But, I digress. 

In regards to religious faith, I consider myself ecumenical and entertain ideas from multiple religions.  However, I live my life to the best of my ability in a manner I feel best exemplifies the teachings of Jesus Christ.  I see Jesus Christ as an activist who fought for the poor and cared about prison reform and prisoner's rights.  He fed the hungry and I hope you get the point on that one.  I live my faith.  I see the bible overall as a choice between war and love.  Genesis has two versions, so does Revelations.  I don't want to digress too much.  But, I could write a book on Genesis and Revelations and my understanding of it if it would be useful to anyone.  I may consider doing so.  I choose the right path offered in the bible, the majority seem to have chosen wrong which is why we're always afraid of "end times".  None of this is on me.  None of it.

Mental Health is a religion and not a science.  Instead of "sins", they punish or convert you and/or your "behavior" (even when it is legal and generally accepted socially).  They do this through a reward and consequence system, sometimes having you punish yourself.  They don't go so far in most cases to suggest actual flogging, but, it is almost identical.  They use "confrontation" and "peer pressure" as a means to convert those not more advanced in "thought reform" (what they call "religious" conversion in the secular community).[1]  And, they make up diagnoses based on who is most likely to dissent or have faith.  Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) is simply a young person who dissents or protests "too much" for the liking of those in authority.  So, now we have two constitutional bases for challenging any involuntary institutionalization on first amendment grounds.

Here is the First Amendment to the US Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  (You may find this of interest:

If you couple the First Amendment with the Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment), you understand that just because someone wants to convert you to their way of thinking, doesn't mean they have the right to force you to convert.  (This depends on the court's interpretation of the clause which varies and can fail to provide equal protection because it is read by some courts to mean solely another phrase for "due process" and judicial authority rather than actual rights of citizens to equal protection as is the common understanding.)  We all have the right to our own faith and religion.  You can't use Freedom of Religion as a basis to force others to think like you.  If you do, you have to accept that everyone has the same right and can try to force you to think like them.  This leads to hostility and often civil war.  So, it is likely best if we enforce the rights of all citizens by not allowing one group to label others and then force them to convert to their point of view.  This is certainly true when there has been no due process and the individual poses no imminent threat or danger to themselves or others.  Unless my years in law school were completely wasted, this is correct.  So, I can back up the case against the "mental health industry", no problem.  The actual documentation is all over the HEAL website.  But, you can start with this one: 

Freedom of speech includes the right to dissent.[2]  So, when "mental" or "behavioral" "health professionals" tell someone they are not allowed to have their own ideas and opinions and they need to conform (even though they exhibit no behavior that is illegal or criminal, nor criminal idea communicated or shared), they are pushing their beliefs and values on others.  If someone voluntarily subjects themselves to this conversion, that is their legal right to do so.  However, any involuntary placement or requirement, (including that which is a result of duress, undue influence, coercion, or deceptive marketing), is a violation of the equal protection clause and first amendment.  While we may not be able to outlaw any religion, we should be able to protect everyone's rights to choose their own faith, think freely, and speak their mind even when they have a dissenting opinion or point of view.

The mental health industry as it is known today is primarily a 5th column operation organized by RAND Corporation and their British counterparts at Tavistock.[3]  They are literally trying to reclaim the United States while using our military to expand and "reclaim" the British Empire.  They are that stupid, evil, and immature.  I want to rescue Monty Python, Eddie Izzard, and The Rolling Stones at this point.  Others too, but, we're in this together.

President Trump is a hero for getting rid of Jeff Sessions.  Sessions actually got rid of protections for the disabled and greatly reduced the civil rights division of the Department of Justice so enforcement is unlikely under his authority.  That's normally where we'd present this problem to request someone redress our grievances.  But, there are some issues right now.  So, I hope any lawyers reading this can use the constitution as a basis for taking out the entire segregated congregate care industry.  In addition, the government should immediately discontinue all funding of segregated congregate care because it is in direct violation of the 1st, 5th, 14th, and likely other amendments in the constitution.  Otherwise, our taxes are literally paying for our enslavement (conversion to obedient consumerism and settling for less) and we should have another tea party.  Take this as you wish.

Anyone who promotes the view that it is alright to institutionalize and convert another American by force to any point of view is not a true American and is a traitor.  I'm going to act accordingly and hope you do as well.  And, it doesn't matter to me if we are talking secular or faith-based institutions.  I referenced the Muslim Cleric Gulen, a terrorist from Turkey, running "charter schools" who was brought here by the Clintons in previous articles and online posts.  I think it is important that we make sure no one is forced to convert to any point of view that is not their own.  I hope we can all agree on that without having a meltdown over Sharia Law.  Our constitution protects us.  We just have to demand a redress of grievances effectively.  And, I've given you a winning argument and strategy so go for it.

Additional Resources and Evidence: (This article is more philosophy than science.  Trust me.)

Monday, August 27, 2018

The Art of Reason and #TaoFu

The Art of Reason and #TaoFu
by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

For this article, I will be providing a list of problems and solutions.  I will give examples of reason, logic, and #TaoFu.  I will not identify whether one or all three are being used.  I will leave that up to you to decide.

Problem #1: An individual seeking refuge, sanctuary, or asylum is offered the opportunity for self-improvement at a facility of the same or similar name.  Upon arrival, they are put in work scrubs and told that the facility (farm, camp, etc.) primarily uses "work therapy" to assist with "life-controlling" or "behavioral" issues.  This can happen to both foreign residents and domestic citizens.

Solution #1: Know where you are going before you get there.  Do not fall for the "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" trick.  See: and  This film was way more important than "Mary Poppins".  Sending or taking family members away for self-improvement while enslaving them and telling everyone to ignore the problem, that's how fascism happens.  So, I've been trying to warn you for a while.  See rest of blog.

In discussion of the above example, consider whether or not "Mary Poppins" inspired sympathy for bankers and the wealthy class and was therefore likely a RAND Corporation influenced film.  Also, consider whether or not "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" might have been the CIA trying to warn everyone about RAND Corporation taking children away to labor camps and hoping that the public would get the hint before 2018 (50 years after the films debut).  President Obama was serious when he said change requires everyone to participate.[1]  Whether President Obama was #TaoFu or actually mocking legitimate activists is up to you.  He knows how I feel.  I wrote him a poem for his birthday while still in office.  It was about saving children.

Problem #2: A private "charitable" corporation is laundering money for a major political party, big oil, Dow Index, Wall Street Journal, Clinton Foundation, and more while actively lobbying, donating over $500,000 to Democrats, and "influencing" public policy while meeting with defense contractors, the Saudi Prince, and United Arab Emirates.  The same corporation targeted me and my organization and has been harassing us almost since inception.  It was the targeting of my organization and my research into those targeting me that led me to uncover the conspiracy.  I fell in love along the way.

Solution #2: This is where it gets tricky.  I've been working on this solution for some time.  I'm going to write a book, consider this a preview.  I reported to local police, regional FBI, remote FBI, and congress.  I've outlined what appears to be prima facie evidence of RICO violations and money-laundering.  I've communicated creatively in hopes to make my point with a touch of humor.  However, I feel the evidence alone is enough for the government to take seriously the fact that RAND Corp is engaging in a soft coup against President Trump right now.  It is a soft coup because he is still alive.  This isn't Chile and he is part of the 1%.  So, they won't kill him.  They will keep targeting, harassing, and maligning him through ongoing smear and propaganda campaigns so he can't accomplish anything while the Republicans scream at the Democrats and the Democrats say "Whatever, you care too much."  So, one solution I am adopting, since I lead by example, is to support Trump as much as I would historically be disinclined to do based on misunderstandings caused by media bias and propaganda.

When considering the above problem and solution, please see earlier blog posts.  In particular, check for the Oliver Stone Conspiracy.  The choice is yours.  The facts and sources are cited.  I've reported as much as I can.  You will need to share the article with your legislators and demand action if you want things to change.  The same is true with contacting law enforcement to report crime.  Reporting to an advocacy organization or network like HEAL, without speaking out publicly or making official complaints with actual authorities, doesn't change things.  And, since most of us, including me, have PTSD, listening to a bunch of triggers day in and day out while no one calls the police or reports to the authorities feels like a mock even when it may not be.  Does that make sense?  We're here to educate the public and influence public policy to help stop the abuse and make sure the laws are strong, don't have absurd loopholes that leave people in jeopardy, and are effectively enforced.  And, that's what I do and will continue to do unless they kill me like they did Edgar A. Poe.  Then, again, it will be up to you.
I'm not giving any more examples right now.  That's enough for you.  You may not even read this and if you do, that should be plenty to think about and act on.  So, good luck with that.  If you enjoyed this article you may also enjoy this Facebook page:

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

The Kingpin of Hollywood

The Kingpin of Hollywood
by Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

Oliver Stone appears to consider himself the meanest gangster in Hollywood.  He uses his celebrity to engage in political propaganda for the Democrats.  George W. Bush should consider suing for misappropriation of name and likeness.  The same goes for the Kennedy family and anyone else who may feel Stone misrepresented them in supposed biopics. 

A curiosity is whether Oliver Stone was threatening or mocking a specific drug lord with "Scarface".  In that film, it seems the point or message is that anyone who puts love and family first is weak.  That is an amoral message if I ever came across one.  And, it doesn't stop there.  You know he's really a Wall Street brat, right?  See previous blog post at:  He's been getting rich off wars for oil while mocking everyone who is actually anti-war and pro-peace.  That's his whole shtick.  Kind of disgusting, right?

I'm not even going to get into "Platoon" other than to say it was too easy.  Everyone knew the war was not won.  So, he could laugh at America's failure while still seeming to give a shit.  That's nice, right?  I prefer "Full Metal Jacket" best.  It was truly the best of the Vietnam War films.  That's my opinion.  Was Kubrick exposing Stone in "Full Metal Jacket"?  How about any of his other films?  You think on that one.

In "UTURN", there is a nasty father/daughter ongoing incestuous rape done in a lustful manner which is triggering and offensive to victims of rape.  In "Natural Born Killers", Mallory is a victim of incestuous rape and is "rescued" by Mickey who later kidnaps a stranger and rapes her in front of Mallory.  Talk about "trigger-happy" directing.  See, we know it was Stone and not Tarantino too.  Tarantino includes rape, but not graphic, and the rapists get their asses handed to them with no sympathy.  Stone is a total asshole and misogynist pig.  Or, do you have another interpretation for this garbage some call "Oscar-Worthy" art?  (Love Tarantino, "Natural Born Killers" would have been unwatchable without his artistry.)

I find Stone's work forgettable and mentioned that previously.  But, the fact that his entire life has been spent fucking everyone over and allegedly laundering money for the United Arab Emirates, RAND Corporation, and the Democrats while mocking the United States of America and helping to destroy western civilization and any hope for democracy without propaganda and constant war, is a bit much even for a huge fan of his beautiful, talented, genius of a son, Sean Stone.  (I believe the HBO show "The Sopranos" may have been a mock of the Stone family.  Think about it.)



Sunday, August 19, 2018

The Oliver Stone Conspiracy

The Oliver Stone Conspiracy
By Angela Smith, HEAL National Coordinator/Co-Founder

William Oliver Stone, better known as Oscar Winning Director Oliver Stone, is likely, in my opinion,  a hack and a fraud.  Beyond this, he is likely a criminal (keep reading).  I'm taking Melissa Gilbert's word for it.  She said he sexually harassed (assault is when you put someone in fear of a battery such as rape, so, assaulted may also apply)  her and his excuse was that everyone knew he was raunchy.  Look it up.  All public record.  Well, I don't know how "raunchy" Mr. Stone is, but, Gilbert had sex with a dog on FX's "Nip/Tuck", so, guessing pretty fucking raunchy.  Beyond this, his films are forgettable and nothing more than self-indulgent garbage intended to confuse the masses with RAND Corporation narratives disparaging the CIA. 

Taking into account his poor excuses for cinema, one must wonder if any of the scenes in "UTURN" were revelatory about his appetites.  For example, why was the incestuous rape scene between father and daughter in the film so lustful?  And, I also wonder if "Tropic Thunder" was a mock of Oliver Stone, Nick Nolte's character specifically.

That's just the Hollywood snooze news and gossip.  But, you should pay attention.  I mentioned RAND Corporation.  Now, what is the connection? 

Oliver Stone most likely invests in First Gulf Bank, HAB Bank, and United Central Bank.  The reason for this presumption is a 19 year old, very close to Oliver Stone, got a job as a credit analyst at First Gulf Bank in the early 2000s.  So, how a 19 year old got such a position without knowing an owner or key shareholder is puzzling to say the least.  Given a reasonable deduction, Oliver Stone is most likely so invested.  Checking his bank records may assist with any needed conclusions. 

Now, First Gulf Bank engages in internationally syndicated debt-based economics and modern slavery.[1]  This is called "globalization" by Alex Jones and his dedicated viewers.  First Gulf Bank is headquartered in Abu Dhabi.[2]  Also headquartered in Abu Dhabi is The Petroleum Club, which has locations worldwide.  It is an actual thing.  First Gulf Bank is connected to United Arab Emirates (UAE).[3]  And, the UAE are members of The Petroleum Club.[4]  Saudi Arabia and the UAE are different in that the UAE is controlled by the British and more involved in economics, trade, and "development", while Saudi Arabia is more for show, like the British "Royals".  So, the issue we have is with UAE and not so much Saudi Arabia when it comes to the bombing in Yemen.[5]  We need to talk to England about their continued imperialism, don't we?  Is the US a free country or do we need to re-fight the revolutionary war?  Alex Jones seems to think so.

"Today Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman began his visit to Los Angeles, where among other business leaders he and his entourage will not only meet major defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing but also executives at Disney and RAND Corporation in Santa Monica."[6]

Now, does the Prince meet on behalf of the UAE or Saudi Arabia?  Does it matter?  Am I getting off track?  See, the connections are there.  So, what about money-laundering?

Well, let me give you some examples and hopefully you will share this article with law enforcement and national security agencies so they can help stop the soft coup being organized by the UAE and RAND Corporation against the United States.  Okay?  Here it goes...

Oliver Stone is a Wall Street Banker from a Wall Street family.  First Gulf Bank is more than likely a big part of his portfolio.  Reasons already provided to FBI.  But, they may need to hear from more of us before taking any action.  I've established the connection between all of them satisfactorily I hope and believe. 

So, RAND Corporation is run by Karen Elliott House who also runs and owns The Wall Street Journal.  Are you with me?  Okay.  RAND Corporation is supposedly a non-profit charity.[7]  Now, what is a "charity" doing meeting with defense contractors and the Saudi Prince?  Does it bother anyone that they are also running the Wall Street Journal?  Am I the only one seeing the connection here? 

RAND Corporation was founded in 1950 and was likely wholly responsible for the blacklisting of multiple Hollywood stars and elite during the "red scare" they orchestrated when they began to influence Hollywood.  In addition, they are arguably responsible for the death of James Dean and Marilyn Monroe (see earlier blog entries and  Beyond this, they turned great cinema into garbage by re-making and re-writing such films as "Love Affair" and "Imitation of Life".  The re-makes were racist and not aligned with the spirit of the original films.  Look into it at your leisure.  (Side Note: RAND Corporation has infiltrated Disney, ABC, and GAIA, among others.  See facebook link above for more citations and info.  It is all there.)

That's more Hollywood stories...  But, you may be more interested in the political side of this story.  See, RAND Corporation has donated a traceable amount of $500,000 mostly to the Democrats.[8]  RAND Corporation lobbies on behalf of defense contractors and oil companies, among others.[9]  They are a charity, so, that's cool, right?  The Clinton Foundation and RAND Corporation are very close and work together.[10]  Hillary Clinton donated $250 to Donald Trump for his presidential campaign through the Clinton Foundation in 2016.[11]

So, it is my theory that there is a soft coup by a bunch of rich assholes who can't handle that the United States of America is a free country and they've been using all means at their disposal to destroy western civilization through the guise of business and charity.  I think we can do better.  And, I think the above proves money-laundering and RICO violations.  Or, at least provides a basis for a serious investigation, don't you?

I'm tired of propaganda and I unbelievably am switching to Republican if there are no Libertarian or Green Party candidates to choose on the ballot.  Does everyone agree we should have ranked choice voting and a more open democracy or am I crazy?

[Side Note:  Sean C. A. Stone was given over 24 hours to edit or suggest changes to this story.  He was offered the by-line and a complete editorial control over the content if changes were submitted before the 11pm deadline.  He has been given the option to request editing or changes after publication.  He is innocent and not to be maligned or unfairly associated with Wall Street criminals regardless of family ties.]